Qingsheng Knitting logoSock Wholesalers Request a quote

Page last updated: October 30, 2026

Compliance · the document type

Audit report: read the document, not the badge on the page

An audit report is a snapshot of one site on two dates, with the corrective actions that were still open written into it. Read that way it is the most useful file in a supplier pack; read as a badge, it says nothing your compliance desk can act on.

1. What an audit report is

A factory audit is a third-party examination of the factory itself — working conditions, safety, management systems. The report is the record of that examination on the dates it was carried out, not a certificate about the goods.

Two reports sit behind this floor, and both are posted as PDFs rather than summarised: a BSCI report of 114 KB and a SEDEX report of 3.8 MB. The sizes are printed because they tell you what you are downloading — one scheme’s document is a short certificate, the other is a long report.

Neither file replaces the other: BSCI is the audit framework, SEDEX is the platform the data sits on, and buyers ask for both by name.

2. What to read first

  1. 01The holder. Zhuji Qingsheng Knitting Co.,Ltd. A number is only useful if the holder is the entity on your invoice; the export desk is not the holder of either file.
  2. 02The dates. BSCI audited 7 Aug 2026, valid until 14 Aug 2027. SEDEX audited 12–13 Aug 2026, re-checked by Aug 2027. Both are semi-announced.
  3. 03The open corrective actions. The SEDEX report lists four, due 19 Sep – 18 Nov 2026. That list is the live part of the document.
  4. 04The scope sentence. Site-level social audit: the factory, not the product, and not the export desk in Shanghai.

Read the report itself, not just the summary page. A SMETA audit reports on labor standards and health and safety, and in its fuller version on environment and business ethics, at the audited site — and it lists corrective actions still open.

3. What it does not cover

  • It does not certify a material, a pair of socks, or a shipment.
  • It is not a chemical or skin-contact statement; on that question the site names OEKO-TEX Standard 100 instead.
  • It does not cover the export and contracting entity, which holds neither file.
  • It is a snapshot, not a guarantee of future performance.

That last line is the site’s own wording, printed beside the certificate table. A buyer who reads an audit as an underwriting decision is reading it wrong, and a supplier who invites that reading is not helping.

And the honest limit on all of it: none of this proves the socks you receive will match your sample. Only a sample approval, a factory visit, a live video walkthrough, or a third-party inspection does that.

4. Verifying the number

Certificate validity should always be checked with the issuing body via the links given. For these two the look-up routes are amfori.org and sedex.com, both named in the table rather than left to a phone call.

The site’s own rule, which is the reason the numbers are text on a page rather than pixels in a badge: every number is read off the document, printed with its holder and its dates, and a cell without a read value says pending rather than carrying a version nobody can point to.

The two records in full: BSCI 26-0419962 and SEDEX (SMETA) ZAA600215648. The verification routes for the factory itself: how to verify us.

Ask for the file, and read the holder first

Both reports go out as PDFs so your compliance team works from the source document. The numbers, holders and dates are also on this site as text, for the version you can quote in a report.

sales@sockwholesalers.com, +86-13761030160. We answer every enquiry within one working day; replies come from Michelle Zhang, Export sales manager.